Blog

In the three days preceding 19 October, the international system displays a paradox: Washington eases energy sanctions against Moscow for electoral reasons, whilst Europe rallies around Kyiv, and drone warfare strikes ports, terminals, and shipping routes. The underlying premise: energy and the maritime domain constitute the true arena of strategic confrontation.

The first pivotal development, of a geopolitical nature, is President Donald Trump’s decision to partially suspend the sanctioning regime of the Lindsey Act against Russia, specifically targeting regulations on crude oil, gas, and maritime transport. According to Fulvio Scaglione (InsideOver), this move comes in response to rising fuel prices and the upcoming mid-term elections. General Carlo Jean (Formiche.net) notes that the alleged energy truce with Moscow has been disproved by events, as Russian bombardments have intensified and Kyiv has resumed deep-strike incursions. Giuseppe Gagliano (Analisi Difesa) highlights the burden falling upon Europe, which finds itself deprived of negotiating leverage.

On the operational level, Notizie Geopolitiche reports that a swarm of over 120 Ukrainian drones struck the Saint Petersburg region, setting fire to the oil terminal at the port, a VKontakte data centre, and a viaduct, causing power outages and the closure of Pulkovo Airport; the headline of the publication refers to over 140 aircraft shot down. The episode confirms Kyiv’s capacity to project power deep into the Kremlin’s logistical and energy nodes, precisely as Washington relaxes its restrictions. Local authorities suspended flights to allow for firefighting and clearance operations, whilst Moscow claims to have intercepted the majority of the air vehicles: a sign of a competition in which air-defence saturation and infrastructural resilience are paramount.

On the maritime front, Notizie Geopolitiche also notes that in the Black Sea, drones have damaged seven merchant vessels in a single month, prompting NATO to convene an emergency crisis meeting on surveillance and the protection of neutral shipping. A joint report produced by ISPI and the North Adriatic Ports Association (NAPA) highlights how the North Adriatic ports — including Ravenna, Venice, Trieste, Koper, and Rijeka — offer a privileged and shorter gateway for maritime trade originating from Asia via the Suez Canal (Formiche.net). The Global Eye indicates that recent political and territorial tensions in Somalia are rapidly transforming the Horn of Africa into a new theatre of geopolitical confrontation linked to Red Sea security dynamics. The interplay between internal Somali rivalries, the instability of the central government in Mogadishu, and interference by external regional powers is creating the conditions for the outbreak of the region’s first true proxy war. All this risks further destabilising fragile local institutions, fueling peripheral armed conflicts, and increasing the risk of maritime piracy.

In the contemporary geopolitical landscape, warfare is progressively shifting towards hybrid forms designed to permeate the social fabric. The integration of national resilience, Atlantic Alliance strategic doctrine, and European Union countermeasures constitutes the foundational architecture for safeguarding democratic sovereignty against the latent multidimensional threats of the modern era.

Carla Romano, in Guerres hybrides et résilience du territoire national published on 2 October on the Institut FMES website (https://fmes-france.org/guerres-hybrides-et-resilience-du-territoire-national/), highlights an unprecedented intensification of hybrid-style aggression orchestrated against European nations. These maneuvers manifest through a broad and complex spectrum of hostile actions, such as cyber offensives directed against critical infrastructure, massive disinformation campaigns, and foreign information interference. Covert strategic sabotage operations and the deliberate weaponisation of migratory flows are similarly detected. This strategy, devoid of formal declarations of war, aims to weaken sovereign institutions from within, fragment civic cohesion, and saturate national response capabilities without ever crossing the threshold of open armed conflict. Territorial defence therefore demands going beyond traditional security concepts to incorporate social, institutional, and technological resilience as a permanent bulwark of counter-action.

From an analytical and doctrinal perspective, hybrid dynamics find dramatic amplification in the domain of cognitive warfare, where the human mind becomes the primary battleground. Periodic NATO reports clearly illustrate how revisionist powers seek to weaponise the cognitive domain to alter decision-making processes and undermine collective trust in democratic institutions. Concurrently, European Union investigations into foreign information manipulation and interference document a systematic and continuous assault aimed at destabilising European support for partner nations and the Ukrainian cause. From a maritime and geostrategic viewpoint, the security of Transatlantic Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs), seabed infrastructure, and coastlines is inextricably intertwined with the protection of the information and digital space. Hybrid warfare blurs the traditional boundaries between peacetime and wartime, necessitating multi-domain coordination across Defence, Intelligence, and the civil industrial sector to intercept and neutralise subversion prior to its escalation.

The protection of states demands an integrated and proactive collective defence posture. It is imperative to reinforce cyber defences, protect intangible critical infrastructure, enhance the cognitive awareness of the population, and consolidate strategic coordination between NATO and the European Union to safeguard continental democratic stability.

The most significant political takeaway is the decoupling between Washington and European capitals. Giuseppe Gagliano, writing in Analisi Difesa, observes that the American energy stance, driven by domestic priorities, leaves Europe with the financial and security burden of the conflict. ISPI notes, however, the cohesion of the EU-27 in supporting Kyiv, whilst Zachary Paikin, in Responsible Statecraft, urges Europe to lead negotiations through its own security architecture and credible guarantees for Ukraine. The Global Eye frames the phenomenon within a broader transformation: 21st-century alliances are becoming temporary, transactional alignments, and Marco Zana reminds readers in Notizie Geopolitiche that oil recognizes no bloc loyalties. On the global stage, The National Interest argues that the conflict with Iran has not deterred China in East Asia and considers the truce in Gaza to be merely nominal one year after its initiation, while Yun Sun, in War on the Rocks, describes China’s re-evaluation of India as a first-tier competitor. On the domestic front, Roberto Vivaldelli (InsideOver) reports protests in France, Albania, and Italy, a symptom of social unrest that could condition government spending decisions. The Eurasian picture is completed by The National Interest, which asserts that Afghan instability blocks transit corridors between Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent, whereas resolving the Greco-Cypriot dispute would strengthen NATO-EU cooperation.

On the doctrinal level, Maurizio Delli Santi, in Analisi Difesa, outlines NATO’s “theory of victory”: containing the initial assault, blocking its continuation, and attriting adversary capabilities, while ruling out the collapse or invasion of Russia. This framework is accompanied by technological adaptation: Davide Bartoccini (InsideOver) reports that the British Army is experimenting with the revival of cavalry tactics to infiltrate forces while evading sensors, whilst Jim Parrott, in Navy Lookout, explains why navies are rediscovering naval guns and fire-control systems to counter low-cost drones, avoiding exorbitant missile expenditure. In the Pacific, The National Interest notes the temporary absence of US aircraft carriers, a deterrence gap exploited by Beijing, and points to Anduril’s Steelfin missile as a potential mass-producible, low-cost response; Jack Lindstrom, writing for CIMSEC, describes Chinese unconventional oceanic warfare based on grey-zone operations. Internal vulnerabilities remain: the explosion at the Canadian range in Wainwright, which resulted in at least seven military fatalities, and the breakdown of HMS Protector serve as reminders that operational readiness depends on training and maintenance. Federico Varese (RUSI) focuses on the threat posed by fentanyl to Italy. Furthermore, NATO documentation emphasizes the defence of the eastern flank, from the Baltics to Poland, and the pursuit of de-escalation channels to prevent uncontrolled escalation. Nationally, ISPI shows an Italian public opinion concerned about the Wider Mediterranean but divided over the allocation of resources between defence and welfare, calling on institutions to articulate the link between investments in technological/cyber security and national interests.

The partial suspension of the Lindsey Act, as Fulvio Scaglione explains in InsideOver, should ease hydrocarbon transit, lowering freight and insurance rates and dampening pump prices; General Jean (Formiche.net) warns, however, that additional Russian oil will not suffice, as supply bottlenecks stem from instability in the Persian Gulf and maritime chokepoints. ISPI notes that Moscow is sustaining itself through a war economy funded by inflation, labour shortages, and dependence on Asian buyers. In the nuclear sector, The National Interest highlights that new Kazakh uranium regulations favour China over Western enterprises. On the industrial front, Shipmag reports on the ten million dollars awarded to Fincantieri Marine Group to modernise its Wisconsin shipyards, while Lorenzo Tordelli (Formiche.net) views lithium- and copper-rich Chile and Peru as promising markets for Italian supply chains. Responsible Statecraft underscores tensions over sovereign debt and the reform of international financial institutions, and Shorsh Surme notes that the Houthis continue to strike oil infrastructure with drones and missiles. The Russo-Ukrainian conflict also weighs heavily on European public finances: supporting Kyiv while enduring an energy line dictated by American interests restricts budgetary headroom. Technologically, the pursuit of affordable, mass-producible munitions — from the Steelfin (a modular, reconfigurable surface-to-air interceptor missile produced by Anduril) to programmable-ammunition guns — is steering the defence industry towards scalable production, while the advanced welding laboratory planned at Marinette Marine demonstrates the value of specialized training. Finally, high energy costs continue to fuel social discontent across European streets.

The maritime domain concentrates global tensions. In the Black Sea, seven merchant vessels struck within a month and NATO’s emergency crisis meeting underscore the threat to food and energy corridors; the attack on the Saint Petersburg oil terminal extends this risk to Russian ports. In the Red Sea, the Houthis have resumed their offensive, while The Global Eye warns that the Somali crisis could transform Mogadishu into the first proxy war theatre in the Horn of Africa, with direct repercussions for Bab el-Mandeb, SLOCs, and piracy. Against this backdrop, Formiche.net highlights the Adriatic as an alternative gateway to Central Europe and a military mobility hub for NATO’s eastern flank, including along the IMEC corridor. In terms of naval power, France is considering extending the operational life of the Charles de Gaulle beyond its scheduled decommissioning date (The National Interest), India is conducting exercises off Plymouth alongside British, German, and Norwegian units (Navy Lookout), and the Royal Navy has temporarily lost the service of HMS Protector. In La Spezia, the Port Authority and the National Subsea Dimension Centre Foundation signed a three-year agreement on seabed security. Furthermore, the suspension of sanctions on the maritime transport of Russian products redefines the role of the shadow fleet, impacting freight rates, insurance coverage, and maritime traffic surveillance. In the Indo-Pacific, the persistent presence of Chinese aircraft carriers contrasting with the US absence, combined with the grey-zone strategy utilizing fishing fleets, coastguard assets, and uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs) described by CIMSEC, is steadily eroding rivals’ freedom of navigation.

For Italy, the most visible event is the resumption of command of the KFOR mission: Major General Roberto Vergori succeeds Turkey’s Özkan Ulutaş for the fifteenth Italian mandate, featuring a posture recalibration to strengthen regional cooperation and the prospective installation of advanced radar surveillance systems to shield the Balkan area from emerging missile threats (Analisi Difesa). The centrality of the Adriatic highlighted by ISPI and NAPA enhances the strategic value of Ravenna, Venice, and Trieste, while Fincantieri’s expansion in the United States and the La Spezia agreement reinforce the maritime industrial base. However, ISPI highlights an electorate split between deterrence and social welfare, protests in Milan, Turin, and Bologna reflect the rising cost of living, and RUSI identifies Italy as a potential transit hub for fentanyl. Regarding Greece, the sources offer no direct references: indirectly, The National Interest argues that resolving the Greco-Cypriot dispute would unblock NATO-EU cooperation in the Eastern Mediterranean, whilst threats to commercial routes in the Red Sea and Black Sea persist. For Spain, implications remain indirect: energy prices, freight rates, and the medium-risk environment in the Western Mediterranean noted by CIMSEC. Athens must also contend with crisis projections emanating from the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa, which The Global Eye ties to the control of ports and SLOCs. For all three nations, the Indian naval exercise alongside European navies off Plymouth and the Royal Navy’s polar difficulties serve as reminders of how vital multilateral naval cooperation is for safeguarding common seas. Underlying the sources’ analysis, flexible alliances and fragmented alignments oblige Madrid, Rome, and Athens alike to maintain greater analytical autonomy regarding energy policy and defence expenditure.

Three files display signs of imminent evolution. The first is US energy policy: the suspension of the Lindsey Act, tied to mid-term elections, must contend with the Persian Gulf crisis and the reaction of allies. The second is the Black Sea, where the outcome of the NATO crisis meeting and the continuation of drone strikes, including against Russian ports, will dictate new convoy escort and surveillance measures. The third is the Red Sea, caught between the Houthi resurgence and the Somali crisis. It is recommended to closely monitor freight and insurance rates, leverage the Adriatic and the underwater domain as core pillars of Italian maritime strategy, support a unified European initiative regarding negotiations over Ukraine, and invest in low-cost counter-drone defences. Over the coming days, NATO doctrine and Chinese posture in the Pacific should also be closely monitored. The Adriatic and the Black Sea represent the primary theatres where decisions taken in the coming days will yield immediate effects on trade and maritime security.

This summary has been prepared based on articles from various geopolitical and strategic analysis sources, including: Elisme, Center for Maritime Strategy, CIMSEC, Reuters, ShipMag, Navy Lookout, National Interest, Seapower Magazine, CSIS, RUSI, War on the Rocks, IISS, Responsible Statecraft, Foreign Affairs, Formiche.net, Il Sussidiario, Start Magazine, InsideOver, Notizie Geopolitiche, IARI, Dissipatio, Analisi Difesa, Jamestown Foundation, Atlantic Council, RAND Corporation.

---

For further insights, please visit the CESMAR websites or social media channels: